Most Americans do not question the requirement to obtain a license to get married. As in just about everything else, this requirement generates unnecessary problems and heated disagreements. If the government was not involved there would be no discussion or controversy over the definition of marriage. Why should the government give permission to two individuals for them to call themselves married?
Ron Paul (via libertarianandy)
(via alowisney)
Your continued support of Barack Obama makes me sick. Additionally, being an antiwar activist does not make me a supporter of the equally deplorable Mitt Romney.
However, there is a difference between Romney and Obama. Unlike Obama, Romney has never been in a position of power that took the lives of hundreds of innocent civilians in a reckless drone campaign and imperialist military interventions.
Romney is merely a warmonger; Obama is a war criminal.
That is all.
(via alowisney)
(Source: onceuponabeat, via alowisney)
(Source: nomosshere, via alowisney)
It only looks impossible because a truly free and peaceful society has yet to be achieved. But once we get there, and we will, people will look back at governments as ridiculous, bloody, and evil hangovers from the primitive and drunken adolescence of our species. Your government cannot protect your property by stealing half of it first. It cannot protect your life by threatening you with endless violent edicts. It cannot protect your currency by forcing you to use a currency that it counterfeits at will. It cannot protect your children by sealing them up in 18th century mental prisons for years, while selling their futures off to the highest bidder.
Stefan Molyneux (via anarchei)
(Source: thinksquad, via alowisney)
(Source: getinvolvedyoulivehere, via alowisney)
